CIRUGÍA MICROGRÁFICA DE MOHS TRATAMIENTO DE LOS TUMORES MALIGNOS CUTÁNEOS DE ALTA AGRESIVIDAD Y COMPLEJIDAD.

Autores/as

  • Michel Faizal Geagea Academia Nacional de Medicina

Palabras clave:

Cirugía de Mohs, cáncer de piel, resección tumoral, histopatología, Mohs surgery, skin cancer, tumor resection, histopathology

Resumen

La cirugía micrográfica de Mohs es el tratamiento quirúrgico con más altas tasas de curación de los tumores malignos cutáneos agresivos localmente invasivos, minimizando el sacrificio innecesario de tejidos peritumorales sanos. Los márgenes oncológicos son determinados en etapas sucesivas, los tejidos son evaluados en cortes histológicos horizontales en tres dimensiones, identificando con precisión la localización de la persistencia oncológica y subsecuente escisión hasta la inexistencia del tumor respetando los tejidos sanos que no son removidos. La conclusión diagnóstica de la evaluación de las neoplasias cutáneas, se deriva del laudo histopatológico el cual debe conducir en la elección de la mejor opción terapéutica. El tratamiento del cáncer cutáneo es realizado con métodos quirúrgicos o médicos, bien sea por la destrucción a ciegas o por la evaluación histológica de los márgenes oncológicos que determinan una porción de los límites del tumor. Las neoplasias malignas cutáneas que no han recibido tratamiento o las recurrentes consideraciones de alto riesgo por presentar características clínicas y/o histológicas agresivas, deben recibir la mejor opción terapéutica. Actualmente la cirugía micrográfica de Mohs ofrece la mejor curabilidad de los pacientes con tumores cutáneos, con un menor sacrificio de los tejidos perilesionales sanos, resultando en pequeños defectos quirúrgicos comparados con las consecuentes de resecciones quirúrgicas convencionales, repercutiendo en la complejidad de la reconstrucción. Las altas posibilidades de curación y los menores defectos quirúrgicos resultantes de la cirugía micrográfica de Mohs, crea un impacto costo-efectivo en la reducción de procedimientos quirúrgicos repetidos.

MOHS SURGERY IN TREATING AGGRESSIVE SKIN CANCERS

ABSTRACT

Final diagnosis in assessing skin cancers derives from histopathology, then choosing the best treatment option. Skin cancer treatment could be surgical or medical, either by tissue blind destruction or by histological assessment of cancer margins, determining a portion of tumor boundaries. Skin malignancies that have not been treated or whenever there are recurrent high- risk considerations because of clinical and / or histological aggressive characteristics, should receive the best treatment option. Currently, Mohs micrographic surgery offers the best curability of patients with skin tumors, with less damage of healthy perilesional tissues, resulting in small surgical defects when compared with conventional surgical resections, affecting the complexity of reconstruction. Higher chances of cure and minor surgical defects resulting from Mohs micrographic surgery, creates a cost-effective impact in reducing repeated surgical procedures.

 

Biografía del autor/a

Michel Faizal Geagea, Academia Nacional de Medicina

Profesor Titular. Dermatología y Cirugía Dermatológica. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Miembro Correspondiente Academia Nacional de Medicina.

Referencias bibliográficas

Rapini RP. False-negative surgical margins. Adv Dermatol 1995; 10: 137-148.

Shriner DL, McCoy D.K, Goldberg DJ, Wagner RF. Mohs Micrographic Surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998; 39: 79-97.

Bennett RG. Mohs surgery. New Concepts And Application. Dermatol clin 1987; 5: 409-428.

Lang PG. Mohs Micrographic surgery. Fresh – Tissue technique. Dermat clin. 1989; 7: 613-626.

Greenway H T,Maggio K L.Mohs micrographic surgery and coetaneous Oncology. In:Robinson j k, hanke C W, Sengelmann R D, Siegel D M. (Ed). Surgery of the Skin proedural Dermatology.2005 Elsevier Inc 777-800.

Bricca G M, Brodland D. Mohs Surgery:The Full spectrum Of application. In:Riegel D S, Friedmann r J, Dzubow L M, Reintgen D S,Bystryn J-C, Marks r. (Ed). 2005 Elsevier Inc 537-548.

Ad Hoc Task Force, Connolly SM , Baker DR, Col- diron B M, et al. AAD/ ACMS/ASDSA/ASMS 2012 appropiate use criteria for Mohs micrographic surgery: a report of the American Academy of dermatology, American College of Mohs Surgery, American So- ciety for Dermatologic Surgery Assosiation, and the American Society for Mohs surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012 ;67:531-50.

Kimyai– Asadi A, Bolberg L H, Jih MH. Accuray of serial transverse. Cross-sections in detecting residual basal cell carcinoma at the surgical margins of an elliptical excision specimen. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005; 53: 469– 474.

Larson PO, Donnell DO, Hetzer M. Dogan M. Mohs fixed tissue preparation in Maloney M, Torres A Hoff- mann TJ Helm KF (Ed): surgical dermatopathology, Massachusetts. Blackwell science, Inc. 1999; p. 49-78.

Alyssa YK, Bennett RG. Determining cancer at surgical margins. In: Maloney M, Torres A, Hoffmann TJ, Helm KF (Ed): surgical dermatopathology. Massachusetts. Backwell science, Inc, 1999; p.107-123

D Huang C , Boyce Sarah, Morthington M, Desmond R, Soong S-J. Randomized, controlled surgical trial of preoperative tumor curettage of basal cell carcinoma in Mohs micrographic surgery. J am Acad Dermatol 2004; 51: 585-591.

Clyton BD, Leshin B, Hitchcock. MG, Marks M, white WL Utility of rush paraffin-embedded tangential sections in the management of coetaneous neoplasm’s. Dermatol Surg 2000; 26: 671-678.

Lang PG. Osguthorpe J D. Indications and Limitations of Mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol clin 1989; 7: 627-644.

Blechman A B, Patterson J W , Russell m A . Application of Mohs micrographic surgery appropriate-use critera to skin cancers at a iniversity healt system. J Am Acad Dermatol 2014;71: 29-35

Barrett TL. Greenway HT, Massullo V, Carlson C. Treatment of basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma with perineural invasion. Adv Dermatol 1993; 8: 277-305.

Forman S B,Ferringer T C,Garret A B. Basal Cell Carcinoma Of The Nail Unit J Am Acad Dermatol 2007;56:811-814

Telfer NR, Colver GB, Bowers PW.Guidelines for the management of basal cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol 1999; 141: 415-423

Leibovitch I, Huigol s c, selva D, Richards s, paver R. Basal cell carcinoma treated with Mohs surgery in Australia II. Outcome at 5 years. Follow– up. J am Acad Dermatol 2005; 53: 452-457.

Leibovitch I, Huigol s c, selva D, Richards s, paver R. Basal cell carcinoma treated with Mohs surgery in Australia III. Perineural invasion. J am Acad Dermatol 2005; 53: 458-463.

Larrabee WF. Immediate repair of facial defects. Dermatol Clin 1989; 7:661-676.

Lawrence N, Cottel W. Squamous cell carcinoma of skin with perineural invasion . J Am Acad Dermatol 1994; 31: 30-33.

Malhotra R, James C L, Selva D, Huynh N, Huigol S C. the Australian Mohs database: periocular squamous intraepidermal carcinoma. Opthalmology 2004; 111:1925-9.

Matorin PA, Wagner RF Jr. Mohs Micrographic surgery: tecnical difficulties posed by perineural invasion. Inter J Dermatol 2002; 31:83-6.

Feasel A M, Brown TJ, Rogle MA, tschen J A, Nelson B R. perineural invasion of cutaneous malignances. Dermatol Surg 2001; 27:531-42.

Rowe DE, Carroll RJ, Day CL. Pronostic factors for local recurrence, metastasis and survival rates in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, ear and lip. Implications for treatment modality selections. J Am Acad Dermatol 1992; 26: 976-990.

Leibovitch I, Huigol s c, selva D, Richards s, paver R. cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery in Australia I. Experience over 10 years. J am Acad Dermatol 2005; 53: 253-260.

Papa CA, Ramsey MH. Digital imaging for mapping Mohs surgical specimens. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000; 43: 712-713.

Mohs FE. Mohs Micrographic surgery. A historical perspective. Dermatol clin 1989; 7: 609-611.

Adams BB, R Gloster HM. Double nicking for Mohs tissue specimen. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000; 42: 1067-1068.

Gloster HM, Taylor AF. Surgical Pearl: The Use of Multiple Different tissue specimens on the same glass slide to enhance the efficiency of frozen section preparation in Mohs micrographic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998; 39: 107-108.

Leibovitch I, Huigol SC, Selva D, Richards S, Paver R. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery in Australia II. Perineural invasion. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005; 261-266.

Broadland DG, Zitelli JA. Surgical margins for excision of primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad. Dermatol 1992; 27: 241-248.

Heaphy M.R., r Ackerman AB. The nature of solar keratosis: a critical review in historical perspective. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000; 43:138-150.

Leibovitch I, shyamala CH, selva D, et al. Cutaneous squamous carcinoma in situ (Bowen´s disease): treatment with Mohs micrographic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005; 52: 997-.1002.

Wang S Q,Goldberg L H,Nemeth A . The merits of Adding toluidine blue-stained slides in Mohs surgery in the treatment of a microcystic adnexial carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007,56:1067-1069

riedman. PM, Friedman RH, Jiang B, Nourik, Amo- nette R, Robins P. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma: Collaborative series rewiew and update. J. Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 41: 225-231.

Leibovitch I, shyamala C H, selva D, et al. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma: treatment with Mohs micrographic surgery. J A m Acad Dermatol 2005; 52: 295-300.

Huether MJ, Zitelli JA, Broadland DE. Mohs microgra- phic surgery for the treatment of spindle cell tumors of the skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001; 44: 656-659.

Hendi A, Brodland D G, zitelli J A. Extramammary paget´s disease: surgical treatment with Mohs micrographic surgery. J A m Acad Dermatol 2004; 51: 767-773.

O´Connor W J, Lim K , zalla MJ, Gangnot M, Otley cc, Nguyen TH, et al. Comparison of Mohs micrographic surgery and wide excision for extramammary paget´s disease. Dermatol. Surg 2003; 29: 723-7.

Cohen LM. What’s new in lentigo maligna. Adv Dermatol 1999. 15: 203-231.

Menaker G M, chiang J K, tabila B, Moy R L. Rapid HMB– 45 staining in Mohs micrographic surgery for melanoma in situ and invasive melanoma. J am Acad Dermatol 2001; 44: 833-836.

Grevey SC, Zax RH, McCall MW. Melanoma and Mohs Micrographic surgery. Adv Dermatol 1995; 10: 175-199.

Johnson TM, Smith JW, Nelson BB, Chang A. Cu- rrent therapy for cutaneous melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995; 32: 689-706.

Zitelli JA, Brown C, Hanusa BH. Mohs Micrographic surgery for the treatment of primary cutaneous me- lanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997; 37: 236-245.

Zitelli JA, Brown C, Hanusa BH. Surgical margins for excision of primary cutaneous melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997; 37:422-429.

Weihstock MA, Sober AJ. The risk of progression of lentigo maligna to lentigo maligna melanoma. Br J Dermatol 1987; 116: 303-310.

Cohen LM. Lentigo maligna and lentigo maligna melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995; 33: 923-936.

Robinson JK. Margin control for lentigo maligna. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994; 31(1): 79-85.

Kelley L C, starkus L. Immunohistochemical staining of lentigo maligna during Mohs micrographic surgery using Mart-1. J am Acad Dermatol 2001; 46: 78-84.

Bienert TN, trotter MJ, Arlette JP. Treatment of cuta- neous melanoma of the face by Mohs micrographic surgery. J. cutan med surg 2003; 7:25-30.

Hitchcock MG, Leshin B. White WL. Pitfalls in frozen section interpretation in Mohs micrographic surgery. Adv Dermatol 1998; 13: 427-462.

Boyer J D, zitelli J A, Brondland D G, D’ Angelo G D. Local control of primary Merkel cell carcinoma: Review of 45 cases treated with Mohs micrographic surgery with and without adjuvant radiation. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002; 47: 885-892.

Piérdard G E, Fazzar, Henry F, et al. collision of primary malignant neoplasms on the skin: the con- nection between malignant melanoma and basal cell carcinoma. Dermatology; 1997; 194(4): 378-379.

Spencer J M, Nossa– R, Tse D t, Sequeira M. Se- baceus carcinoma of the eyelid treated with Mohs Micrographic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001; 44: 1004-1009.

Katz K H, Helm K F, Billingsley E M, Maloney M E. Dense inflammation does not mask residual primary basal cell carcinoma during Mohs micrographic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001: 45: 231-238.

Mondragon RM, Barrett TL. Current concepts: the use of immunoperoxidase techniques in Mohs microgra- phic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000; 43:66-71.

Jiménez FJ, Clark RE. Buchanan MD. Kamino H. Lymphoepithelioma – like carcinoma of the skin trea- ted with Mohs micrographic surgery in combination with immune staining for citoqueratinas. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995; 32: 878-881.

Jiménez FJ, Grichnik JM, Buchanan MD, Clark RE. Inmunohistochemical techniques in Mohs microgra- phic surgery: Their potential use in the detection of neoplastic cell masked by inflammation. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995; 32:89-94.

Stonecipher MR, Leshin B, Patrick J,White WL. Management of lentigo maligna and lentigo malig- na melanoma with paraffin– embedded tangential sections: Utility of immunoperoxidase staining and supplemental vertical sections. J Am Acad Dermatol 1993; 29: 589-594.

Banfield CC, Dawber PR, Walker N. et al. Mohs micrographic surgery for the treatment of in situ nail apparatus melanoma: A case report . J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 40: 98-99.

Siegle JR, Schuller DE. Multidisciplinary surgical approach to the treatment of perinasal nonmelanoma skin cancer. Dermatol Clin 1989; 7: 711-731.

Weisberg NK, Bertagnolli MM, Becker DS. Combined Sentinel lymphadenectomy and Mohs micrographic surgery for the high– risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000; 43: 483-488.

Bernstein G. Healing by secondary intention. Dermatol Clin 1989; 7: 645-660.

Leonard A L, Hanke W . Second Intention healing for intermediate and large postsurgical defects of the lip. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007 ; 57:832-835

Faizal M , Bulla F. Carcinoma faciales múltiples de alta agresividad, manejo y técnicas de reconstrucción quirúrgica. Rev. Col. Dermatol: 1998; 6 (2): 25-20.

Thibault MJ, Bennett RG. Success of delayed full – thickness skin grafts after Mohs micrographic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995; 32: 1004-1009.

Fritz T, Burg G, Hafner J. Eyebrow reconstruction with free skin and hair– bearing composite graft. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 41: 1008-1010.

Madani S, Huilgol S, Carruthers A. Unplanned in- complete Mohs micrographig surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000; 42: 814-819.

Cook J, Zitelli JA. Mohs micrographic surgery : A cost analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998; 39: 698-703.

Silapunt s, Peterson S R. Alcalay J, Golberg Lh. Mohs tissue mapping and processing: a survey study. Dermatol surg 2003; 29: 1109-12.

Lebwohl M, Bernhard JD. The case for micrographi- cally controlled skin surgery. Editorial. J AM Acad Dermatol 2000; 42: 698-699.

Liang CL, Jambusaria-Pahlajani A, Karia PS, et al. A Systematic review of outcome data for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with and without fibrosarcoma- tous change. J Am Acad Dermatol 2014,71:781-786.

Bricca G M, Brodland D G, Ren D, zitelli J A. Cuta- neous head and neck melanoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery. J Am acad Dermatol 2005; 52: 92-100.

Cómo citar

[1]
Faizal Geagea, M. 2015. CIRUGÍA MICROGRÁFICA DE MOHS TRATAMIENTO DE LOS TUMORES MALIGNOS CUTÁNEOS DE ALTA AGRESIVIDAD Y COMPLEJIDAD. Medicina. 37, 3 (sep. 2015), 242–265.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Descargas

Publicado

2015-09-30

Número

Sección

Artículos de Revisión